Film festivals are recognized as milestones in the film industry, held to establish a connection between artists and audiences. But do these events really contribute to the quality of cinematic works, or have they merely turned into large and costly promotions?
Bitter Truths in Venice
The wall of criticism at the Venice Festival, serving as a platform for expressing the opinions and feelings of viewers, clearly reflects the anger and disappointment of audiences towards certain films. In this space, the voices of the viewers are distinctly heard, and they can express their opinions without any filter. These realities indicate that in the world of cinema, only awards and big stars cannot represent the true quality of a film.
Although festivals are considered places for discovering new artistic works and showcasing talents, it seems that sometimes, in this quest for attention, the quality of the works is overlooked. Should audiences really be waiting for another film from Danny Boyle about drugs for cinema to return to depth and truth?
Cinema, a Victim of Hype
The film industry is strangely dependent on the changing tastes of audiences, and festivals have emerged as venues for presenting "evidence" of quality. From golden awards to audiences standing in the middle of screenings, everything seems essential for establishing a film's credibility. Meanwhile, many works, instead of being brilliant, easily fall into the trap of hype and marketing.
So, is cinema really in search of truth and quality, or does it merely settle for attracting attention and fame? The wall of criticism in Venice, as a mirror of the dissatisfaction and desires of viewers, raises the question in our minds: is it not time for filmmakers to move towards more meaningful and profound content?
